Some features of WorldCat will not be available. You may send this item to up to five recipients. Don’t have an account?However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study.
Bu nedenle Mezopotamya’n. Devri’nin Ege ve Eski Yunan d Eski ege ve yunan uygarl. Ege ve Yunan Tarihi, Arif M. No installation, no registration, it's free and easy to use. Split PDF files at splitpdf.com. Girit Medeniyeti Ege ve Yunan Medeniyeti. Ege Medeniyetleri Tarihi pdf kitap oku Friedr Ege ve Anadolu Uygarl. Ege ve Yunan Tarihi (1947.
The name field is required. Preview this item Preview this item. Your Web browser is not enabled for JavaScript. The E-mail Address es you entered is are not in a valid format.vf The E-mail Address es you entered is are mansep in a valid format. Reviews User-contributed reviews Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.Finding libraries that hold this item You may have already requested this item. Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.
Citations are based on reference standards.Please create a new list with a new name; move some items to a new or existing list; or delete some items. Preview this item Preview this item.Linked Data More info about Linked Data.
Cancel Forgot your password?Please choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours. Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.
Turkic Names of PelasgiansThe language spoken by the Pelasgians, pre-Greek settlers of Greece, has not been identified yet. Nor has the origin of the names of most pre-Greek provinces and cities, or the names of mythological images of the country been identified. What is known is that these names are not Greek. This is also confirmed by the interpretations of the Greek myths. According to H.Kitto, a researcher of ancient Greece, the conflicts between pre-Greek Athena and Greek Poseidon is, in fact, a reflection of the wars between the native Athenians and the Hellenic occupants. The Athenians, the inhabitants of Attica, were not Greeks, more exactly pre-Greeks. However, Poseidon, as a Greek god, represented the Hellenic people.The later Greeks themselves believed in an original non- Hellenic population which they called Pelasgian, remnants of which still remained pure in classical times, speaking their own language.According to Herodotus, one of the two main branches of the later Greek people, the Ionians, were Pelasgian by descent, the other, the Dorians, were Hellenic.
Greek-speaking people from the north migrated into this region and imposed their language on the Pelasgians.To the earlier historians of Greece, Thucydides and Herodotus, the country before the Greeks settled, was called Pelasgia.Herodotus regarded the Ioninas as a «barbarian» people who had been Hellenized.So the pre-Greek settlers of Greece appear to have spoken a language, the origin of which is still unknown. In relation to that language Herodotus wrote: «What language the Pelasgians used I cannot say for certain, but if I may conjecture from those Pelasgians who still exist they spoke a barbarian language».Neither could the European linguists manage to learn what language the Pelasgians used. Those who alleged it to be of Indo- European origin were not based on serious linguistic facts. Most of the researchers could not differentiate the early non-Greek substratum from the later Indo-European layer, which had appeared in early Greek onomasticon as a result of the assimilation of the Pelasgians. L.Gindin, a researcher of the pre-Greek substratum in the old Greek language, admitted the existence of the oldest non-Indo-European layer, referring it, however, not to the Pelasgians, but to those who had settled in Greece before the Pelasgians.
Like other European linguists, he supported the Indo-European origins of the Pelasgians.This point of view does not conform with some of the facts - neither does it conform with the Etruscan character of the writings found on Lemnos, settled once by the Pelasgians, nor with the information of ancient writers about the origin of the Pelasgians. Both factors tie the Pelasgians with the Etruscans who are commonly known to have been non – Indo-European by origin.The Lemnos script has been proved by Western linguists to have only a dialectal difference from the Etruscan writings.It raises the question as to how the Pelasgians could have been Indo-European by origin in the event that their language had a close relationship with those of the non-Indo-European Etruscans.In the light of antique traditions the idea of their kinship appears to be more believable.
The “fifteen achievements” E. Akurgal gathers in his book titled “The Aegean. Birth of Western Civilization” under the section referring to “The Importance of Eastern Hellenic Art and Culture in World History”; inessence, is a summary of the artistic and cultural superiority of the “Eastern Greeks” over the “Western Greeks”.My only disagreement with this statement is the use of the terminologies “Eastern Greek” and/or “Eastern Hellenic”. The Hellenic character of the Ionians doesn’t be based on the historical documents; instead it bases on the myths fabricated with the nationalist view in Athens, seven hundred years after the immigrations, in the 5th century.It is obvious that themyth is not the history. The perception of the Ionian land as a part of the Hellenic land is because of the same myth. It was a tale of “colonisation” of the Hellenic people won by war, on the mid-west Anatolian costs and the nearby islandsby the leadership of the Athenians after the barbaric attacks of the Doric people.